Screener
FOTO vs FLCO
Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF vs Franklin Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- FOTO is classified as equity, while FLCO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FOTO follows a active selection strategy; FLCO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FOTO | FLCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $590M |
| Since | — | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.63% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.49% |
| Max drawdown | — | -22.71% |
Similar to FOTO and FLCO
Explore further