Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FOTO vs FORH

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF vs Formidable ETF

FOTO

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

FORH

Formidable ETF

Annual cost

1.19%

Fund size

$20M

Key differences

  • FOTO is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • FOTO follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

FOTOFORH
Annual cost (TER)1.19%
Fund size (AUM)$20M
Since2021
Dividend yield1.73%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+14.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.14
Volatility 1Y15.70%
Max drawdown-20.73%

Similar to FOTO and FORH