Screener
FOTO vs IGM
Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- FOTO follows a active selection strategy; IGM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FOTO | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $9.5B |
| Since | — | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +61.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +41.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.32% |
| Max drawdown | — | -40.68% |
Similar to FOTO and IGM
Explore further