Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FOTO vs SHV

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF

FOTO

Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

SHV

iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$20.6B

Key differences

  • FOTO is classified as equity, while SHV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • FOTO follows a active selection strategy; SHV uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

FOTOSHV
Annual cost (TER)0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$20.6B
Since2007
Dividend yield3.92%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+4.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A4.35
Volatility 1Y0.21%
Max drawdown-0.45%

Similar to FOTO and SHV