Screener
FPAA vs GAL
FPA Global Allocation ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
Both FPAA and GAL are mixed asset ETFs. FPAA charges 0.49% a year and GAL 0.35%. The main difference: FPAA follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- FPAA follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- GAL costs 0.14% less per year.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPAA | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $306M |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.11% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.04% |
| Max drawdown | -0.86% | -28.31% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.