Screener
FPAG vs TMFG
FPA Global Equity ETF vs Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Key differences
Both FPAG and TMFG are equity ETFs. FPAG charges 0.49% a year and TMFG 0.85%. The main difference: FPAG follows a index tracking strategy; TMFG uses active selection.
- FPAG follows a index tracking strategy; TMFG uses active selection.
- FPAG costs 0.36% less per year.
- Over the last three years, FPAG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TMFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPAG | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $517M | $356M |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 0.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.1% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.92% | 13.24% |
| Max drawdown | -28.43% | -33.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.