Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FRNW vs ICLN

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

FRNW

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

Fidelity Investments

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$141M

ICLN

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$2.5B

Key differences

  • ICLN is significantly larger than FRNW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, FRNW has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FRNWICLN
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$141M$2.5B
Since20212008
Dividend yield1.01%1.30%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+84.9%+78.6%
CAGR 3Y+9.2%+7.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.330.27
Volatility 1Y25.62%25.99%
Max drawdown-59.37%-66.75%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to FRNW and ICLN