Screener
FRWD vs BCSM
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF vs Baron SMID Cap ETF
Key differences
Both FRWD and BCSM are equity ETFs. FRWD charges 0.65% a year and BCSM 0.75%. The main difference: FRWD follows a active selection strategy; BCSM uses index tracking.
- FRWD follows a active selection strategy; BCSM uses index tracking.
- FRWD costs 0.10% less per year.
- FRWD is much larger than BCSM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FRWD | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $32M |
| Since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.49% | -17.45% |
Similar to FRWD and BCSM
Explore further