Screener
FSCS vs FAD
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FAD is significantly larger than FSCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSCS | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $480M |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.01% | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -43.57% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSCS and FAD
Explore further