Screener
FSCS vs FNK
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF vs First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FSCS costs 0.14% less per year.
- FNK is significantly larger than FSCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FNK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSCS | FNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $217M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.01% | 15.67% |
| Max drawdown | -43.57% | -50.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSCS and FNK
Explore further