Screener
FSGS vs EPSB
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.27% less per year.
- FSGS is significantly larger than EPSB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FSGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSGS | EPSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $5M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.30% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -43.25% | -8.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSGS and EPSB
Explore further