Screener
FSMD vs EMMF
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Key differences
- FSMD costs 0.33% less per year.
- FSMD is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FSMD covers north america markets; EMMF covers emerging markets.
- FSMD follows a index tracking strategy; EMMF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSMD | EMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $167M |
| Since | 2019 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 16.07% |
| Max drawdown | -40.67% | -32.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSMD and EMMF
Explore further