Screener
FTCS vs KONG
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- FTCS costs 0.36% less per year.
- FTCS is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTCS is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FTCS follows a index tracking strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FTCS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FTCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTCS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $22M |
| Since | 2006 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.97% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -31.93% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTCS and KONG
Explore further