Screener
FTLS vs RONB
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF vs Baron First Principles ETF
Key differences
- RONB costs 0.38% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTLS is classified as alternative, while RONB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FTLS follows a long short strategy; RONB uses active selection.
- FTLS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTLS | RONB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $388M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.19% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.54% | -13.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTLS and RONB
Explore further