Screener
FTMA vs NEAR
Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Inc ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- NEAR costs 0.10% less per year.
- NEAR is significantly larger than FTMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTMA follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
- NEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTMA | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $273M | $4.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.15% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -2.27% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTMA and NEAR
Explore further