Screener
FVAL vs FESM
Fidelity Value Factor ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.13% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than FVAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FVAL follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FVAL | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $5.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.74% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FVAL and FESM
Explore further