Screener
FVAL vs FMCX
Fidelity Value Factor ETF vs FM Focus Equity ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.56% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than FMCX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FVAL follows a index tracking strategy; FMCX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FVAL | FMCX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $118M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.79% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -17.70% |
Similar to FVAL and FMCX
Explore further