Screener
FVAL vs LRGF
Fidelity Value Factor ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.07% less per year.
- FVAL follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FVAL | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.4% | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.74% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FVAL and LRGF
Explore further