Screener
FXI vs BLCV
iShares China Large-Cap ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
Both FXI and BLCV are equity ETFs. FXI charges 0.73% a year and BLCV 0.46%. The main difference: FXI follows a index tracking strategy; BLCV uses active selection.
- FXI follows a index tracking strategy; BLCV uses active selection.
- FXI covers the Asia-Pacific region; BLCV covers North America.
- BLCV costs 0.27% less per year.
- FXI is much larger than BLCV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BLCV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FXI | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.73% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | $325M |
| Since | 2004 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.1% | +20.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.9% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.92% | 11.65% |
| Max drawdown | -60.81% | -13.44% |
Similar to FXI and BLCV
Explore further