Screener
FYC vs ACSG
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.21% less per year.
- FYC is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FYC follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- FYC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FYC | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $15M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.07% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.85% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FYC and ACSG
Explore further