Screener
FYC vs TMFM
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund vs Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FYC costs 0.15% less per year.
- FYC is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FYC follows a index tracking strategy; TMFM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FYC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FYC | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $117M |
| Since | 2011 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.7% | -19.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.1% | +3.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.07% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -47.85% | -31.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FYC and TMFM
Explore further