Screener
FYX vs AFSM
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FYX costs 0.17% less per year.
- FYX is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FYX follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FYX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FYX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FYX | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $94M |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.2% | +35.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.43% | 17.93% |
| Max drawdown | -48.82% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FYX and AFSM
Explore further