Screener
GABF vs GGRW
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF vs Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF
Key differences
- GGRW costs 1.24% less per year.
- GABF is significantly larger than GGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GABF follows a index tracking strategy; GGRW uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GABF | GGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $8M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.3% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.37% | 14.79% |
| Max drawdown | -20.86% | -50.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GABF and GGRW
Explore further