Screener
GAL vs AOA
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 0.20% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than GAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while AOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2012 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and AOA
Explore further