Screener
GAL vs FPAA
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs FPA Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
Both GAL and FPAA are mixed asset ETFs. GAL charges 0.35% a year and FPAA 0.49%. The main difference: GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; FPAA uses active selection.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; FPAA uses active selection.
- GAL costs 0.14% less per year.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | FPAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $306M | — |
| Since | 2012 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.16% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -0.85% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.