Screener
GAL vs QRMI
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.25% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; QRMI uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $16M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 12.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.1% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.75% | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and QRMI
Explore further