Screener
GAMR vs FDRS
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.10% less per year.
- GAMR is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GAMR follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- GAMR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAMR | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $77M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.42% | — |
| Max drawdown | -54.16% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAMR and FDRS
Explore further