Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GAMR vs IPAY

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs Amplify Digital Payments ETF

GAMR

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF

Amplify ETFs

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$37M

IPAY

Amplify Digital Payments ETF

Amplify ETFs

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$174M

Key differences

  • GAMR costs 0.16% less per year.
  • IPAY is significantly larger than GAMR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, GAMR has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GAMRIPAY
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$37M$174M
Since20162015
Dividend yield0.57%0.87%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+20.8%-18.0%
CAGR 3Y+14.9%+3.4%
CAGR 5Y+0.2%-7.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.560.11
Volatility 1Y22.42%23.27%
Max drawdown-54.16%-51.75%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to GAMR and IPAY