Screener
GBF vs IUSB
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF vs iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IUSB costs 0.14% less per year.
- IUSB is significantly larger than GBF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBF | IUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $36.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 4.24% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +0.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 3.66% |
| Max drawdown | -19.67% | -17.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBF and IUSB
Explore further