Screener
GBF vs SLQD
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.14% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than GBF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLQD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GBF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBF | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -19.67% | -12.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBF and SLQD
Explore further