Screener
GBIL vs GBND
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
Both GBIL and GBND are fixed income ETFs. GBIL charges 0.12% a year and GBND 0.25%. The main difference: GBIL follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GBIL follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GBIL costs 0.13% less per year.
- GBIL is much larger than GBND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBIL | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.6B | $502M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.76% | -2.76% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.