Screener
GBND vs DUSB
Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF vs Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- DUSB costs 0.10% less per year.
- DUSB is significantly larger than GBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBND | DUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $480M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.43% |
| Max drawdown | -2.76% | -0.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBND and DUSB
Explore further