Screener
GBTC vs BETH
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF vs ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF
Key differences
- BETH costs 0.55% less per year.
- GBTC is significantly larger than BETH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBTC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBTC | BETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.50% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.5B | $13M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 56.75% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -32.2% | -32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +64.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.18% | 46.34% |
| Max drawdown | -89.91% | -52.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBTC and BETH
Explore further