Screener
GCOR vs GBND
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- GCOR costs 0.17% less per year.
- GCOR follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GCOR | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $791M | $480M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.07% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.94% | -2.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GCOR and GBND
Explore further