Screener
GDMA vs AMAX
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and AMAX are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and AMAX 1.36%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- GDMA costs 0.61% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than AMAX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $64M |
| Since | 2018 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 10.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 10.31% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -16.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.