Screener
GDMA vs NDAA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and NDAA are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and NDAA 0.65%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; NDAA uses tactical allocation.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; NDAA uses tactical allocation.
- NDAA costs 0.10% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than NDAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | NDAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $5M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 11.20% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -13.50% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.