Screener
GDMA vs RLY
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
GDMA is an alternative ETF, while RLY is a fixed income ETF. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and RLY 0.50%.
- GDMA is an alternative fund, while RLY is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; RLY uses active selection.
- RLY costs 0.25% less per year.
- RLY is much larger than GDMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2018 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 10.38% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -34.17% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.