Screener
GDOC vs GSGO
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.30% less per year.
- GSGO is significantly larger than GDOC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDOC covers global markets; GSGO covers north america.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDOC | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $163M |
| Since | 2021 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.13 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.01% | -13.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDOC and GSGO
Explore further