Screener
GDT vs USFR
WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund vs WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Key differences
- USFR costs 0.05% less per year.
- USFR is significantly larger than GDT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDT follows a active selection strategy; USFR uses index tracking.
- USFR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDT | USFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $17.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.28% |
| Max drawdown | -18.06% | -0.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDT and USFR
Explore further