Screener
GDXJ vs AUMI
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs Themes Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- AUMI costs 0.17% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than AUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDXJ | AUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.7B | $30M |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.7% | +65.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +44.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.42% | 47.96% |
| Max drawdown | -57.78% | -31.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDXJ and AUMI
Explore further