Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs EDIV

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

EDIV

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both GEM and EDIV are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and EDIV 0.49%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; EDIV uses index tracking.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; EDIV uses index tracking.
  • GEM costs 0.14% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMEDIV
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.49%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$1.3B
Since20152011
Dividend yield1.85%4.49%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+12.2%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%+19.4%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%+10.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.001.13
Volatility 1Y20.62%12.40%
Max drawdown-37.02%-40.76%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GEM and EDIV