Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs EEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$30.3B

Key differences

Both GEM and EEM are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and EEM 0.72%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; EEM uses index tracking.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; EEM uses index tracking.
  • GEM costs 0.37% less per year.
  • EEM is much larger than GEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$30.3B
Since20152003
Dividend yield1.85%1.77%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+42.2%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%+22.1%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%+5.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.000.98
Volatility 1Y20.62%21.09%
Max drawdown-37.02%-39.82%

Similar to GEM and EEM