Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs REMG

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$103M

Key differences

Both GEM and REMG are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and REMG 0.64%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; REMG uses index tracking.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
  • GEM costs 0.29% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than REMG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMREMG
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.64%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$103M
Since20152025
Dividend yield1.85%1.08%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+45.2%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%N/A
CAGR 5Y+6.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.00N/A
Volatility 1Y20.62%21.69%
Max drawdown-37.02%-14.13%

Similar to GEM and REMG