Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs XCNY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$10M

Key differences

Both GEM and XCNY are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and XCNY 0.19%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; XCNY uses index tracking.
  • XCNY costs 0.16% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than XCNY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMXCNY
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$10M
Since20152024
Dividend yield1.85%2.26%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+31.1%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%N/A
CAGR 5Y+6.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.00N/A
Volatility 1Y20.62%17.22%
Max drawdown-37.02%-19.70%

Similar to GEM and XCNY