Screener
GEME vs CGIE
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs Capital Group International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGIE costs 0.21% less per year.
- CGIE is significantly larger than GEME — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; CGIE uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | CGIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.0% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.99% | 16.12% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -13.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and CGIE
Explore further