Screener
GEME vs SAMT
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- SAMT costs 0.09% less per year.
- GEME is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GEME follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEME | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $265M | $619M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.12% | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -16.86% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEME and SAMT
Explore further