Screener
GEND vs IDVZ
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.37% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while IDVZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND covers north america markets; IDVZ covers global.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $155M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.70% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and IDVZ
Explore further