Screener
GEND vs SPDV
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
GEND is an alternative ETF, while SPDV is an equity ETF. GEND charges 0.38% a year and SPDV 0.29%.
- GEND is an alternative fund, while SPDV is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; SPDV uses index tracking.
- SPDV costs 0.09% less per year.
- SPDV is much larger than GEND. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | SPDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $94M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 3.30% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.8% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.67% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -43.81% |
Similar to GEND and SPDV
Explore further