Screener
GEND vs UDIV
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
Key differences
- UDIV costs 0.32% less per year.
- UDIV is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while UDIV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; UDIV uses index tracking.
- UDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | UDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $121M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.70% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -35.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and UDIV
Explore further