Screener
GEND vs XUDV
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.29% less per year.
- XUDV is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while XUDV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; XUDV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | XUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $64M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.70% | 12.27% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -15.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and XUDV
Explore further